News 5 min. read

Great North Run apologises for Newcastle-Sunderland medal mix-up

Great North Run organisers apologise after 2025 medals featured Sunderland instead of Newcastle, promising a unique keepsake for runners despite the error.

Great North Run apologises for Newcastle-Sunderland medal mix-up

By Editorial

Introduction to the 2025 Great North Run medal controversy

The Great North Run, one of the UK's most iconic half marathons, found itself in an unusual spot of bother following the 2025 event. Runners and fans alike noticed a glaring error on this year’s official medals and finisher T-shirts, which mistakenly showed the River Wear and the city of Sunderland instead of the River Tyne and Newcastle. The mistake sparked swift reactions from organisers, who issued a light-hearted apology while affirming the event's continued celebration of the North East region.

What went wrong with the medal design?

The 13.1-mile route traditionally runs from Newcastle upon Tyne to South Shields, famously tracing the River Tyne. However, the medal’s background map featured the River Wear, which flows through Sunderland, a neighbouring city approximately 12 miles south of Newcastle. This geographical mix-up was also replicated on the official finisher T-shirts, further amplifying the oversight.

Despite the blunder, organisers emphasised that the medal included notable regional landmarks, including the Stadium of Light, Sunderland’s famed football ground, alongside Newcastle United stars who were present on the start line. The organisers’ statement acknowledged the error with a pun, saying, "Wear sorry!" – a playful nod to the river and city mistakenly depicted.

Organisers' response and public reaction

The Great North Run team admitted that despite many scrutinising the designs closely, no one caught the error before production. The statement conveyed a mixture of regret and humour, highlighting the unique nature of this year's keepsake. They assured participants that this medal and T-shirt would be a memorable part of Great North Run history, one to be discussed decades from now.

Sir Brendan Foster, the event’s founder and president, commented on the mishap, admitting that despite living his entire life on the River Tyne, he had not noticed the mistake. He expressed pride in the event’s success regardless, promising a more geographically accurate design for 2026 after "brushing up on our geography." Foster’s candid admission helped soften the situation and maintained goodwill among runners and fans.

Impact on the Great North Run’s reputation

Errors in major events can often lead to reputational damage, but the Great North Run's handling of this situation helped to maintain its status as a beloved community event. The organisers’ transparency and humour turned a potential PR crisis into a talking point that highlighted the event’s regional pride and inclusivity.

Moreover, the incident sparked renewed interest in the event’s geography and history, with many runners sharing their own stories and photos of past races. This engagement adds to the rich cultural tapestry that the Great North Run fosters annually.

How this compares to other sporting event mishaps

Sporting events occasionally face similar design or organisational hiccups. For instance, in football, there have been cases of incorrect kits or branding errors, while marathons worldwide have seen route miscommunications. What sets the Great North Run apart is the swift apology and the organisers’ ability to embrace the error with good humour, turning it into a memorable story rather than a scandal.

In the wider context of UK sports, such mistakes are rare but serve as reminders of the complexity involved in staging large-scale events. For example, the Premier League, known for its precision and commercial success, has faced challenges such as fixture clashes or broadcasting errors, which require prompt solutions to satisfy fans and stakeholders alike (Premier League top scorers who is leading the charts in 2024).

Looking ahead to the 2026 Great North Run

The organisers have firmly dismissed rumours that the medal's design hinted at a route change for 2026. The Great North Run will continue its traditional course from Newcastle to South Shields, maintaining the event’s heritage and connection to the River Tyne.

This incident has, however, encouraged organisers to implement even stricter quality control measures for future merchandise and promotional materials. Fans and participants can expect a renewed focus on local identity and geographical accuracy in next year’s event.

Conclusion: A memorable chapter in Great North Run history

While the 2025 Great North Run medal blunder was an unexpected twist, it became part of the event’s charm and history. The organisers’ candid and humorous approach helped maintain community spirit and showcased the event’s resilience.

For those interested in the broader sporting landscape, the Great North Run’s experience serves as a case study in crisis management and fan engagement. It also highlights the importance of local pride in regional sporting traditions.

To explore more about UK sports and related stories, check out our comprehensive guide to UK football leagues and teams, offering insights into the country’s rich sporting culture.

Related topics

Great North Run medal mix-up River Wear River Tyne Newcastle Sunderland error 2025 half marathon Great North Run medal error
R

Editorial

Sports expert at SportsScoop

Specialist in sports analysis and journalism

Want to read more?

Explore our comprehensive collection of sports articles and analysis, or contact us for more information.